Rwanda Inc. Business plan

The concept of genocide was introduced by the Western world and was modelled on the Holocaust as the main point of reference. Western culture, which, as always, considers its own values to be universal, exports the term without adaptation or nuance to other 'similar' contexts - such as Rwanda - which have very different geographical, historical and cultural roots. Constantly referring to the example of the Holocaust, the consequences of such a massacre are also considered to be known in advance: traumas, the need to organise memory, etc. The consequences of such a massacre are also considered to be known in advance. This thinking in stereotypes leads to self-filling prophecies with each new genocide: the new reality rather confirms the already known hypotheses than giving rise to thorough research. What value can we attach to such generalistic conclusions?