ROTTERDAM - The Port of Rotterdam claims to champion sustainability but is the reality matching its marketing?

My investigation into the greenhouse gas monitoring and reporting in the Port and, wider, the Netherlands, shows asevere under-reporting of the second-most important greenhouse gas, methane. This under-reporting is especially severe as thePort develops solutions it claims to be sustainable - LNG for maritime transport, hydrogen for energy - but which will actuallyincrease the Port’s climate impact. Simultaneously, methane emissions in the energy sector can be easily minimised at a low cost- provided they are detected. The situation in the Port illustrates a much wider misunderstanding of greenhouse gas reporting,where even the Dutch government gets confused.The second part of my research focused on a big-picture view of the Port’s energy transition, placing the solutions it is developingand their critiques in a geopolitical context. This article is forthcoming at the beginning of June.

Team members

Zuza Nazaruk

Zuza Nazaruk is a freelance journalist writing about environmental and social sustainability, migration, and public policy.

Zuza Nazaruk
€ 5.450 allocated on 30/09/2022.

need resources for your own investigative story?

Journalismfund Europe's flexible grants programmes enable journalists to produce relevant public interest stories with a European mind-set from international, national, and regional perspectives.


support independent cross-border investigative journalism

We rely on your support to continue the work that we do. Make a gift of any amount today.